Tuesday, 16 December 2014 00:00

As my buddy Jim Strait say's "Seriously, who still holds on to Clovis first anymore?"

Written by
Rate this item
(0 votes)

As my buddy Jim say's "Seriously, who still holds on to Clovis first anymore?"

The evidence for Native American populations migrating to the America's prior to 13,000B.C. is irrefutable, but there is still much left to be discovered. 

Naia_paleo_american_skull_underwater_in_Hoyo_Negro_Yucatan
National Geographic photo of Naia, Greek for sea nymph, underwater in Hoyo Negro

"For most of the 20th century it was assumed that the mystery had been more or less solved. In 1908 a cowboy in Folsom, New Mexico, found the remains of an extinct subspecies of giant bison that had roamed the area more than 10,000 years ago. Later, museum researchers discovered spearpoints among the bones—clear evidence that people had been present in North America much earlier than previously believed. Not long after, spearpoints dating to 13,000 years ago were found near Clovis, New Mexico, and what became known as Clovis points were subsequently found at dozens of sites across North America where ancient hunters had killed game.

Given that Asia and North America were connected by a broad landmass called Beringia during the last ice age and that the first Americans appeared to be mobile big-game hunters, it was easy to conclude that they’d followed mammoths and other prey out of Asia, across Beringia, and then south through an open corridor between two massive Canadian ice sheets. And given that there was no convincing evidence for human occupation predating the Clovis hunters, a new orthodoxy developed: They had been the first Americans. Case closed.

That all changed in 1997 when a team of high-profile archaeologists visited a site in southern Chile called Monte Verde…" Read more at http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2015/01/first-americans/hodges-text

Last modified on Tuesday, 24 February 2015 21:43
 
 
Real time web analytics, Heat map tracking